The New York Times, the Boston Globe and the Boston Herald have all, at times, promoted and participated in perpetrating voyeurism and involuntary pornography.
I am sure that they are far from being the only media sources that have done those things.
I think this is why:
-The world is full of cruel and irresponsible people. Some of them work in the media.
-If privacy laws are no longer respected, then everyone is potential prey for media profit. Nothing will be off-limits.
That's also why the media does almost no reporting about these crimes, although they are crimes which target men and women and people of all ages. It has an investment in preventing public and legislative awareness of how pervasive these crimes are.