Sunday, May 3, 2020

My vote for stupidest article so far goes to...

Quotes:




________



_______



________


Does the writer of the article even know that then-Senator Biden was present at the 1991 hearings where Anita Hill testified?  What does this writer consider to be a pattern? 

I have also noticed how many media stories there aren't discussing Ms. Reade's allegation in the context of the incident being 2 years after those hearings.  Nobody could say that, by 1993, Mr. Biden was intellectually unaware of issues of sexual misconduct in the workplace.  

The writer goes on to say:


_____


________



_______


That's what the writer calls taking Ms. Reade seriously?

By the way, Ms. Reade's allegation is that the assault was perpetrated in the basement.  


Fortunately, the article does end.  

This is what it says:


_______


The writer of the article is female.

Are there any questions about how predators such as Harvey Weinstein flourish in Los Angeles for decades? 



Article:

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-05-02/column-whatever-happened-with-tara-reade-in-1993-biden-is-still-infinitely-better-than-trump