That being said, my anger at the corruption, hypocrisy and alternately cringing and unabashed dishonesty of the Democratic
Party is not the only reason that I don’t apologize for having provided such
support to the Trump administration as I’ve been able to do since President Trump
was elected. Anyone whose individual
voice is heard by a President should consider it an honor and a privilege. Nobody is as chagrined as I am that my limited
formal education and stress-induced emotional fluctuations have prevented me
from being as helpful as I might otherwise be.
I don’t seek employment by this White House, nor do I plan to be employed
by any White House. My First Amendment
right is enough for me; for all of its faults and imperfections, the United
States is a good place.
My interactions with the Obama administration, many of which
were squandered by my lack of political experience, gave me some informal
training about how not to talk to or about a President. There were times when President Obama was
receptive to some of what I said; I did not take full advantage of those times. Knowing when and how to do that is an
essential skill, and I’m still far from being a political professional.
This doesn’t excuse what the Obama administration allowed
the conglomerate to do. Nobody can be
prepared for every turn of world events, but you have to at least try to effectively
address those events. The Obama administration
didn’t try the way that it should have, and it even participated in some of the
conglomerate’s terrible activities. The
conglomerate has undermined society.
Deliberately, systematically, remorselessly, the conglomerate has attacked
fundamental morality and promoted a global hierarchy of predation, predicated on power.
I like to characterize the way that I began and have
continued my interactions with the Trump administration as being neither naïve nor
cynical. The conglomerate doesn’t like
to acknowledge my right to have opinions about my life; there is not one
statement that I can make about why I do things that the conglomerate doesn’t
ridicule as being false. I’m not sure
why the conglomerate hasn’t stopped calling me a liar; 100% of the time, for 9 years, it has been wrong about
every celebrity or other prominent person whom it has accused me of trying to
pick up or otherwise exploit.
My gender, my poverty, and perhaps also my age, are major
stumbling blocks for the conglomerate’s perception of me; greed and laziness
are the only motivations, and stereotypically “feminine” manipulation the only
tactic, which the conglomerate is willing to assign to me. In June 2019, I’ll start my 7th
year of homelessness since 2011. Since
2010, more wealthy people than I can count or recall have spent literally millions
of dollars displaying their interest in having me on their Mistress Payroll. I have declined every invitation, through every
crisis which my lack of financial resources has caused me, and I don’t know
what else the conglomerate needs to have happen to me for the conglomerate to
stop accusing me of being mercenary.
Since his election, when I took stock of President Trump in
the reality of his Presidency, I have said that he is a lot smarter than his
detractors want to think that he is.
Despite the divergence of our thoughts about several things, that
continues to be my opinion, and it also continues to be my opinion that those
who would rather set him at the center of an ongoing political maelstrom rather
than to relate to him honestly and respectfully, even while in disagreement
with him, are being arrogant and childish.
They are wasting time; the world has so many problems that need to be
solved that the smugness of those who would rather use their interactions with
him as grandstanding for the media and other cliques are doing a disservice to
everyone.
Although the conglomerate’s main recreations are malicious scrutiny
of me and gossip about me, there are probably few to no people who read or who
chose to remember or to tell anyone that I advocated for the appointment of a Special
Counsel to investigate accusations against then-newly-elected President
Trump. I published a page about it. My reasoning was that the constant barrage of
accusations was deleterious to the ability of anyone trying to create progress
for the United States, and that a single line of inquiry, to which those making
accusations would be accountable and at the end of which President Trump would either
succeed or fail, would be better for everyone.
I left it up to qualified others to determine the facts and render
judgment, and while that was taking place, I was free to consider other subjects,
to write about them, to give my opinion, to ask questions, and to refuse to be
a part of what can only be described as irresponsible hysteria. Famine and other epidemics are not eradicated
from the planet, are they? I prefer to
think that I have chosen most consistently to have empathy with the perspective
of someone who is dying from one of those problems, rather than to spend my
time in speculation about a process which I don’t control and to which I have
no ability or authority to give meaningful information.
The idea that someone is innocent until proven guilty is not
about emotion. It is not about
believability. It is about principle,
but it’s not only about principle. It
allows people who are accused of infractions to continue in their current professional
and personal roles until such time as a legal and defined process indicates that
those roles should change.
