Thursday, April 30, 2020

Dr. Ford's bathing suit saved her from gang rape.

People shouldn't have to wear bathing suits to parties so that drunken assailants have a few minutes, mid-assault, to think about whether or not they want to follow through on a premeditated felony.

The emotional impact of the assault stymied Dr. Ford from pursuing personal and professional happiness and achievement with the confidence of her similarly talented, similarly diligent, male counterparts.

It's not enough to say that her attackers didn't hurt her.  They did hurt her.

It's unacceptable for perpetrators to lie about sexual misconduct, trying to cast doubt on survivors instead of taking responsibility.  It is particularly unacceptable for people who want to be Supreme Court Justices to lie under oath.

Deborah Ramirez was also credible.

Justice Kavanaugh should have withdrawn.


Quotes:




________





Article:

https://www.thecut.com/2019/09/deborah-ramirez-kavanaugh-accused-sexual-assault.html

Ms. Reade hasn't been inconsistent.

She has been patient and polite.  She has taken all appropriate avenues.  She is generous to a fault toward the limitations of her supporters and detractors.

Reticence isn't contradiction.  Even when assault survivors make contradictory statements, that is known to be a possible result of trauma.

Does Ms. Reade still want to be a Senator?  I prefer that people have law degrees before they run for office.  Maybe she could get one of those and then think about it.


What's "essential work?"

Quote:



Article:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/biden-should-release-his-papers/610801/



I appreciate that I can buy barista-dependent beverages in some locations even during a pandemic.  I wouldn't say that's more important.

Isn't it a problem that there isn't a mechanism?

Quote:



Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-house-dem-hakeem-jeffries-tara-reade-biden-allegation-serious



What is the timeline that is developing?

Is it:

-Those mistreated by prominent men never reported.  Prominent men expected that nobody would ever hear about it.

-Survivors attempted to report, were subjected to social and professional torture, and their abusers were treated as if they were the victims or even heroes.

-Survivors attempted to report or were induced to report in some way, and despite heightened public awareness of tactics and dynamics such as victim-blaming, victim-shaming, attacks on a victim's overall credibility and mental health, and the privilege of power, their abusers still got away with it, in front of everyone.

-?


I have questions about police departments.

Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tara-reade-dc-police-biden-sexual-assault-complaint-inactive


_________________


When a police department feels direct or indirect pressure to end an investigation, whom can the police department tell about it?

Police departments have a bad reputation for being not as helpful as they could be or even hostile to people who report sexual assault.  I'm not saying that has nothing to do with chauvinism or a male-dominated work environment that influences both male and female officers and investigators.  I'm asking how much of the indifference or hostility is also about fear of retaliation against police departments and investigators.  

Everywhere, police departments are part of their communities.  Even more than the average person, the average police officer has been everywhere in his or her city, is involved in people's lives, is familiar with and familiar to various organizations, and lives in or near that city.  Sexual assault is one of the most emotional crimes in terms of how everyone who is connected to or hears about the perpetrator and the victim responds.    

How many sexual assaults can the human beings in a police department investigate before the emotional burden of the community fallout paralyzes that department? As an institution of police departments all over the country, all of which have that same emotional burden, who is there to hear about it and consider solutions?

That's not even to discuss in detail, at this page, the fear of financial and other material retaliation, which is obviously always in direct proportion to the power of the accused perpetrator.  

Aren't the police government employees? 


Wednesday, April 29, 2020

08/30/16: Boston Medical Center, Psychiatrist's Notes





I try not to lose my temper, even to the point of raising my voice, when I'm talking to psychiatrists.  Unpleasant things can happen when you do that.

I also don't tell them that I'm suicidal unless I want to be admitted to a psychiatric ward, which I only do when I am acutely suicidal or unable to function because of the unrelenting stress of being bullied to death.  

During the entire time that I was her patient, I told this psychiatrist almost nothing about what was really going on.  I only tried to tell her about the hidden, illegal cameras in the apartment I had then because I hoped that she'd believe me and tell authorities that I wasn't delusional or paranoid so that I wouldn't be evicted for asking that they be removed.  She was not helpful. 



Talking points and changing stories

It seems as if the Biden campaign forgot to include some talking points from the New York Times, so I have added them.

How many times are sexual assault survivors accused of changing their stories?  What survivors are accused of doing as a way to discredit them, the New York Times has offered as an explanation in its own defense, and it's still being mentioned as if it is definitive when it's not even-up-to date.



Quote:






Article:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/rubycramer/joe-biden-tara-reade-talking-points-campaign-defense




Quote:




Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-camp-reportedly-pushing-ny-times-report-as-talking-point-to-combat-tara-reade

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

I'm taking a break tomorrow.

Probably.

Care to speak?



You have what you have because other women spoke.  All of the powerful women who are hurting Ms. Reade have what they have because other women were courageous, because other women did the work, for decades, for centuries.  Now all these powerful women can think about is having more.  

Men and women

Most men are bigger and stronger than most women.   Other than that, the genders are the same.

They have the same capacity for good and evil, greed and generosity, honesty and dishonesty, and every other human tendency.

What's happening now is historic.  Already-powerful women are ganging up to discredit a sexual assault survivor so that they can, personally and individually, be more powerful.

They are blatantly hypocritical, and they are entirely cynical, knowing that their betrayal of women's safety around the world is going to be eagerly accepted as legitimate because they are female.

Maybe it's time for them to start their own club.  They should invite Senator Collins.

WOW!

Now SHE'S talking about the NYT article as if it's definitive, too?



Quote:




Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/stacey-abrams-biden-tara-reade-allegations

And no sexual assault.



Vice President Biden should drop out of the race.


I don't know what to do about the voyeurism.

I'm surrounded by liars.

No code, I don't want to be famous, don't hack me, take the cameras out of the bathrooms and everywhere else that it's ILLEGAL for them to be.

This is a wretched day.

How is it that prominent, female Democrats are answering additional corroboration of Ms. Reade's story by giving more support to Vice President Biden?

Is this because the former neighbor said she thinks she doesn't have a choice other than to vote for Vice President Biden?

Do you not hear her saying that she thinks she DOESN'T HAVE A CHOICE?

I'm trying out hashtags:

#NoChoice/NoIrony/NoFair

#THISISINSANE

Senator Gillibrand

Would you also like to issue a formal denial of knowing about what's been going on since 2010? 

Rather than continue to publish these pages individually, should I ask if everyone who has known about the crime promotion that has destabilized the world since 2010 would like to issue a formal denial of knowing anything about it?



President Trump

Our interactions may permanently change from now on.

I have to choose Tara Reade over Vice President Biden, and I can't do that while ignoring all other context.

I'm so grateful for every decent thing you've done, and I want you to remember that no matter how things are from now on.  It is a privilege to be known to the President, and I'm sorry that I wasn't knowledgeable enough to be more consistently helpful.

I'll miss your friendship and the kindness of your family, but there's nothing else I can do.  What I did not know about meeting people halfway when Barack Obama was President is what I tried to apply when you were elected.  I'm not sorry.  Sometimes, being hated and even ridiculed is an inadvertent honor, bestowed by hypocrites.

Secretary Clinton

Would you like to issue a formal denial that there's a shred of truth to anything that I have said about what's been going on since 2010?

Deny:

-the conglomerate

-the promotion of sexual harassment

-the promotion of child molestation

-the promotion of voyeurism and involuntary pornography

-the promotion of femicide

I'm a liar.  I'm a psycho.  You have no idea what I'm talking about.  The Democrats don't know.  The Republicans don't know.  The media doesn't know.  The entertainment industry doesn't know.  Corporations don't know.  Cultural institutions don't know.  Everyone whom I have said knows, doesn't.

You didn't know about it in 2010.  Nobody at the White House knew about it.  Nobody at the White House now knows about it.

Is that what you'd like to say, while you attempt to add your shovel of dirt to bury Ms. Reade?










Monday, April 27, 2020

I need a break.

Whenever I say that I'm taking a break, I never take it.  I'm always writing again a few hours later or the next day.

I need to remember that the world can turn without me.

We're not talking about dumb criminals.

These are sophisticated people, then-Judge Kavanaugh's performance at the hearings notwithstanding.  If they went around assaulting and harassing everyone, they'd have had to relinquish the reputations and power that are the most important things in their lives a long time ago.




Yes, the one woman counts or no, she doesn't.  We already have our answer in this case.  

Maybe Justice Kavanaugh's behavior at the hearings was even deliberate.  He knew he was going to be on television.  Maybe he didn't want to seem too smart.  I'm sure he thought about his presentation.  Maybe he went for the Everyman persona:  pained, falsely accused, not smug, not elitist, not assured of success, adamantly insisting on his innocence because that's all he can do.   

I hadn't thought about that before today, although at the time of the hearings it had already occurred to me that his official record of support for women was perhaps calculated to offset accusations of his youthful misconduct if those accusations were ever brought forward.  

Men who support women's rights theoretically shouldn't be so singular that they're excused for calling their victims liars.  


Assault is assault, and he lied under oath.

Quote:




Article:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2018/9/11/18390179/judge-brett-kavanaugh-has-earned-the-support-of-women

Abuse of power

From Google:




These hearings put Senator Klobuchar on the political map for people who had never heard of her before.  They did a lot to help her when she was running for President, and her support of Vice President Biden contributed substantially to his campaign.  

Now she has turned the clout that she gained against Ms. Reade, because Ms. Reade is in the way of her ambition.  

Hey, Everybody, just read one story!

It's the only one I read, and it tells the version that I want to hear!


Quote:



Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-accuser-tara-reade-media-democratic-vp-picks-silence






Sunday, April 26, 2020

Out of respect for HER DAUGHTER

Quote:



Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-leaders-in-congress-remain-mum-on-biden-sexual-assault-allegations-despite-moutning-uproar-from-progressives


Why would she be more specific?  What do we already know about retaliation?

You're talking about a time when regular people did not have a voice if the media didn't give them a voice.

Please.  Think.

I didn't check for an email from Dr. Hill today.

I know all too well how invested everyone who knows that I'm telling the truth is in maintaining silence.  Nobody wants to admit that torturing me is fun for everyone who isn't me, and nobody wants to admit to criminally victimizing all of those other people, either.

No code, I don't want to be famous, don't hack me, take the cameras out of the bathrooms and everywhere else that it's ILLEGAL for them to be.

Ms. Reade shouldn't feel she has to choose from among her supporters.

We all need all the help we can get.

My eyes really hurt.

I hadn't meant to write at all today, because they hurt so much by the end of yesterday.

Sometimes, I still can't believe that I'm in the middle of the world like this.  How did I end up here?

202-336-5700

You can call that number and ask "What about Tara Reade?"

Quotes:


_______


_______



Webpage:

https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/01/christine-blasey-ford

I don't apologize.

I never said that I didn't believe the people who accused President Trump of sexual misconduct.  The only thing that I have said about those allegations is that I believe them.  I published more than one blogpage about that issue.  I have also said that if someone wants to prosecute him for sex crimes, I won't object.

When someone is in office, you have to work with him.  If you want to investigate allegations while he's in office, you can do that, while you maintain a respectful demeanor that is appropriate to your interactions with an elected official, to the best of your ability.

Everyone has more than one side to him or her.  That's what the Democratic Party and most of the media refused to acknowledge about President Trump.  They all wasted a lot of time and energy caricaturing him instead of having consideration for what that caricaturing cost the world's perception of the United States or for what it cost the people experiencing the most dire crises all over the world, who don't have time or energy for endless, stupid jokes.

In 2016, I also knew what the rest of the world didn't, which was the abject, vicious, mirthful corruption hidden by sanctimony and allowed, tolerated and/or participated by most of the political world, by most of the media, by most of the entertainment industry, by many corporations, by all of the professional, male sports leagues, by many cultural institutions, and the list continues.

What I already knew about the Democratic Party in 2016, the rest of the world is witnessing at intervals.

I don't know what to say about Secretary Clinton.  My main concern was that the entertainment industry not gain even more access to the White House, since that industry already has far more power than it knows or cares how to be responsible for.  I did not campaign for President Trump.  I did not blog in support of him before his election.  I began to interact with him online after he was elected.  I have frequently disagreed with him; nobody can honestly say that I haven't.

He has been as kind to me as he knows how to be.  He is a man of his generation, worse than some and better than others.

I said that then-Judge Kavanaugh should withdraw rather lie under oath.  He chose to lie under oath, and now the world knows that, in the United States, the blusterings of a man who shouts "I like beer" can win without too much trouble against the quiet, credible testimony of a female Ph.D.

There is an alternative to Vice President Biden.  That's Senator Sanders.

Brad Pitt

Where were you kicking Angelina Jolie in the fight scene from "Mr. & Mrs. Smith?" In the place where she later carried three of your biological children?

Outside of the disgusting fantasy world that you all live in, most women can't fight back.  Unlike viewers, they're not shielded from the pain by couches.

That's what I was thinking when I watched that clip at my phone a few days ago, although I didn't talk about it.  I didn't blog about it.  I didn't film a video talking about it at my hacked phone.

It seems to me that my being expected to give an explanation for totally innocuous things that I do wherever I have what is supposed to be the legally protected, reasonable expectation of privacy is abusive.

I'm sure that you don't think about it that way, and neither does Saturday Night Live.

Were you invited to host the show because I watched that clip at my phone?

Here's an explanation that I hope will help to alleviate your decade of consternation at my lifetime of having no interest in dating you:

Dunno.  You just never did it for me, and that was even before I knew what you and the rest of the M&E industry are really like.

I feel that way about a lot of people from that industry.  I know it's provoked a debilitating neurosis for them, which is why they feel the need to watch me in the bathroom and monitor me everywhere that technology and the lack of scruples make invasions of my privacy possible.


I'm a Democrat.

I have always been a Democrat.  I haven't talked about that for a while; it's one of those things that people don't gossip about, unlike anything and everything that any malicious person wants to say about me.

Harassed by...pasta?



This is another thing that I won't be mentioning to any psychiatrists.  

I'm assuming that nobody has talked to Ms. Reade about code.  How is she going to know if I'm crazy or not?  I could write a page about the primarily obscene lexicon that has accrued since 2010, but it's depressing, and I don't know if I'd be more believable for writing it.

Yeah, me too.



She's certainly saying all the right things as far as the media is concerned.

She is decimating Tara Reade's chances of being heard.  The media is jumping all over her self-promotion as a way out.  

A fraction of the work for a lot more credit

Why is Vice President Biden being given so much credit as if he's a champion of women's rights?

What about all the women who did and have continued to do the work, who take the phone calls and do the advocacy, who live with discrimination day after day and year after year?

Are people actually afraid that the entire women's movement is going to fall apart if he's made accountable for sexually assaulting someone decades ago and calling her a liar about it now?

The twisted narrative repetition begins.

Tara Reade needs to clarify this before it's repeated again in the media.  The same thing was said in another news story yesterday.  In my experience, once an interpretation like this starts, it's repeated by one news source after another until it's accepted as fact.

Quote:



Article:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-larry-king-episode-featuring-biden-accusers-mother-disappears-from-google-play-catalog

Saturday, April 25, 2020

Vice President Biden



Please have the dignity, integrity and empathy to withdraw from the race.  

I don't feel victorious.  I only feel sad.  

I also have no reason to think that Senator Sanders, as President, would make the world safer for me than anyone else has.  However, as far as I know, he hasn't been accused of sexual assault.  

You shouldn't be making other people participate in your lie.  You shouldn't be making people choose between their consciences and any political agenda. 

Dr. Hill hasn't answered my email from April 20, 2020.

I used a ProtonMail address and didn't give my name.  All I did was ask for help.

I don't know if she hasn't read it or if she hasn't had time to answer it or if she doesn't want to answer an anonymous email.  I didn't give my name because if she hasn't heard of me I don't want her to Google my name and immediately conclude that I'm delusional.




If you know that I'm telling the truth about voyeurism in the Boston area, or you believe me even though nobody has corroborated it to you, why not contact her, give her all the information that you have, and ask her to answer me?








No code, I don't want to be famous, don't hack me, take the cameras out of the bathrooms and everywhere else that it's ILLEGAL for them to be.

Charlie Puth

Not only are you not going to help, your response demonstrates that you're going to continue to spitefully harass me with coded references to illegally watching me in my home.

You know nothing about women's issues.  Despite your expensive degree from Berklee College of Music, the school failed to prevent the music industry from turning you into a caveman with a keyboard.

The fashion industry

Does someone from the fashion industry want to tell the truth about voyeurism today?

Much like the entertainment industry, you make your living directly from the public.  Don't you care that the public has been criminally victimized for a decade?

When hatred and fear break through the platitudes

This is how people really feel about the homeless.  They don't care if they live or die; they just don't want them around.


Quote:



Quote:






Regular people aren't yet being kept prisoner in their homes, are they?


Article:

Lhttps://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-18/gavin-newsom-project-roomkey-homeless-people-housing-california-hotels

I think this is a major issue.

Female reporters shouldn't be attacked or pressured for reporting about sexual misconduct.





There's nothing fair about what you're doing to Tara Reade.

She's telling the truth and you're lying.



My worth isn't defined by whether or not someone wants to marry me.

I know that's a shocking idea for you; it is for a lot of people.



This picture isn't as offensive as most of what you publish. I can't spend time objecting to everything offensive that you do, or talking about everything that you don't question about what you think people are or what the world is like.  You're one of many people who think that a woman isn't legitimized as a person until she's married.  Also, after a decade of being degraded by celebrity men while they're offering to marry me, I now know that you all think of yourselves as being so fabulous that you think it's normal to abuse women.  You really do.  Contrary to your conscious or unconscious value system, wealth and fame don't entitle you to treat people badly, and despite Biblical and many cultural precedents, marriage doesn't render premarital abuse respectable.  My behavior isn't the problem.

I'm not going to date or marry you.  I have already told you that many times.

I know that my weeks of objecting to your Twitter profile picture while not talking about your Instagram profile picture have been a source of more victim-blaming, just something else to use as an excuse for not corroborating that the voyeurism is real.  These pictures at Justin Bieber's Instagram do not surprise me:








Yup.  He had time and motivation to set up an entire, accusatory fashion shoot, but not to contact Anita Hill to corroborate the voyeurism that has criminally victimized me and what are now thousands of other people for a decade.  Yup, there's the reference to your Instagram profile picture.  Yup, there's the reference to my putting my legs on the back of my couch when I'm reading or writing. 

😴




So, are you really going to tell Dr. Hill what's going on? Are you really going to call her or email her?  That would be the right thing to do. 

Even if you do that, it won't erase the years of illegal video that have already been filmed of me and other innocent and unsuspecting people.  We all still have to live with it for the rest of our lives, vulnerable to the entire world.  Trying to stop these crimes from continuing is the least you can do.  



Way to seem credible right now.

She's grateful (an amazing concept), so she's reTweeting it for you.



Friday, April 24, 2020

SHE CAN'T NOT WIN!

HE'S LYING!





She said the clip was out there. 

She is telling the truth and he is lying.  He has to withdraw from the race.  If he won't, he needs to be asked to withdraw or made to withdraw.  

Nobody can continue to ignore these allegations.  He's lying.  








Is it that nobody wants to be on record?

Is that why nobody has corroborated or tried to stop the voyeurism in all this time, in a decade?

Everyone sits there and laughs.  So many people know, hundreds of people know that I'm telling the truth.

All of them, apparently, have decided for all of these years to think that I enjoy being the victim of these disgusting crimes, and they haven't decided that because I have said anything other than that I hate it.  It's because nobody wants to leave a paper trail; nobody wants to be implicated.

When I say that I'm not believed but that anyone who knows that I'm telling the truth and who corroborates it will be believed, they all know that in fact they would be believed.  They don't want anyone to know that they did this.  Nobody has a problem with my being ridiculed and slut-shamed every day for a decade; everyone has a problem with the idea of his or her name being implicated in the scandal that this really is.

Is that it?

That's also why people who know that I'm telling the truth keep offering to date me while they ignore all of my requests that they corroborate that I'm telling the truth.  They have already spent years proving that they don't care if I live or die, if I'm sobbing or angry or too depressed to move.  They just want me to say that what they're doing isn't that bad.

Even if I kill myself, that would make things easier for them.  Suicide is dramatic, for one thing, and they all love drama.  Probably the novelty of voyeurism on a mass scale is wearing off for them anyway.  If I kill myself, it would give them something to write guilty songs, movies, television shows, news stories and so on about.  Then they'd have their catharsis, but perhaps even more importantly, the only person who's talking about it would be dead.

Thanks.

The methods that I usually think about are hanging myself in my closet or jumping off a bridge or a building, but I appreciate your concern.




You don't mean me, do you?

Now I remember:  you and the administration that you were part of have spent a decade doing nothing to stop criminal voyeurism from victimizing me or anyone else.  You all already know that I have talked about suicide because of this abuse and other abuses which you allowed to flourish from 2010 to the day you left the White House.  If it weren't for the courage of others, the prominence of Me Too and the gymnasts who spoke out about sexual abuse, the conglomerate would still be promoting sexual harassment and child molestation in addition to voyeurism and involuntary pornography.  

Almost every time that I take the train, I think about jumping in front of it.  I apologize to the conductor if I ever end up doing that.

Sometimes I think about stepping in front of a truck, but I think the driver would probably swerve to try not to hit me and that might hurt other people.  I also think about that when I think about jumping off a building; first of all, how would I get up there, and second of all, I wouldn't want to fall on someone.

Maybe now that people aren't around as much there's less chance that I'd hurt someone by falling on him or her from the top of a building.  I don't think I could make myself jump, though; it's not that I'm afraid of heights, I just think I couldn't do it.  The option that scares me the least is the train; it's over the fastest and there's no possibility of surviving it with brain damage.  Again, I apologize to the conductor whenever that might be.  I also think about trying not to jump where other people might see it from the platform and be traumatized.

When I call suicide crisis hotlines, obviously I can't tell them specifically that the world's power structure has been bullying me to death for a decade. If I tell them specifically, they'll think I'm delusional and it won't be a productive conversation.  I also don't tend to answer their questions about whether or not I have a plan; what's the point of spending their limited time describing my years of extensive planning in the midst of near-total despair? I call them so I can talk to someone; I can hear myself talk about suicide any old time, and I do.

Dr. Hill hasn't answered my email from April 20, 2020.

I used a ProtonMail address and didn't give my name.  All I did was ask for help.  

I don't know if she hasn't read it or if she hasn't had time to answer it or if she doesn't want to answer an anonymous email.  I didn't give my name because if she hasn't heard of me I don't want her to Google my name and immediately conclude that I'm delusional.  




If you know that I'm telling the truth about voyeurism in the Boston area, or you believe me even though nobody has corroborated it to you, why not contact her, give her all the information that you have, and ask her to answer me?  






No code, I don't want to be famous, don't hack me, take the cameras out of the bathrooms and everywhere else that it's ILLEGAL for them to be.

What, no G-spot references for Barbra Streisand?

She's an older woman.  I thought that G-spot references were de rigueur among entertainment industry types when discussing older women.

How do you think you're going to make her really like you if you're not yelling things like "I HAVE NAKED PICTURES OF YOU, MOM!?"





___________







It's not beyond your control to tell the truth about the voyeurism.

You just don't want to tell the truth.  You don't want to admit that you and everyone you know have done something this bad for so many years.




Every day, all day, you tell yourselves lies that make you feel like there's nothing wrong with criminally victimizing people who can't stop you.  You have done that for so many years that it's now a way of life for all of you.  

You do everything that you can not to think about that one rule, the only rule that matters:

Do onto others as you would have them do onto you.  

Everything else is just noise when you're hurting people so much.  

Support for the bros, from the bros



What, no picture of yourself on the toilet?



You're not going to film yourself masturbating and send the video around to as many people as possible?

Why wouldn't you do that?  Don't you want everyone to respect you?  

Wait, do videos like that make people not respect whomever was filmed? No.  No way.  That's not what you and everyone else have been trying to tell yourselves and me for all these years about my being filmed without my consent.

So, here's my question.  Why do you and all the other people who know that I'm telling the truth think that it's not only funny but admirable when you do to someone something that you'd never allow to happen to you? 

Here are some more questions:

How did you woo whoever took the picture of you wearing shorts? Did you say "Come over to my place; I have hidden cameras everywhere that will record everything we do and say?"  Did you say "I'm going to spend years taking pictures and film of myself to indicate my amusement at your being filmed without your consent, and I'm going to publish them at my social media and in music videos to show off to all my friends because they're never tired of those jokes?"  Did you say "I'm going to have hidden cameras installed where you live because I want to watch you and hear you in your own home when I'm bored.  I don't care if you can never have people over to your apartment; I don't care if you have to live in ridiculed isolation for the rest of your life."  

You didn't say those things, did you? You didn't say them because you'd never live the way that you think it's funny for me to have to live, you'd never expect anyone who wasn't incredibly stupid to be flattered by continual lewd references to her being criminally victimized, and you'd never, ever threaten anyone whom you wanted to like you with making her live the way that I am forced to live.