Friday, September 20, 2019

Charlie Puth




Why don't you start a television show called "Sitting with the Stars?" 


Also, are you about done hitting on women who already have boyfriends or husbands while you plot your next witless, misogynist scheme to hurt and humiliate people who never did anything to you? 

I did a lot of work on the misogynist dismantling of the Rolling Stone article about a gang rape at UVA, which you obviously never read, preferring to get your information from the rape-friendly idiots with whom you surround yourself.

Some facts:

-Phi Kappa Psi's statement, published in the Washington Post, denying the incident said that there is no rush in late September.  

-The University of Virginia's website about fraternities says that there is a rush in late September for upperclassmen.  

-Jackie's rape was on September 28th (Rolling Stone).

-The person who facilitated the rape, a junior given the pseudonym of "Drew," had been a student at UVA and a member of another fraternity 6 years before he met Jackie.  The Charlottesville Police Department's statement about its investigation gave those facts about Drew, that he'd been at UVA before and a member of a different fraternity 6 years before, with no explanation of why he'd taken time off.  The police statement also said that Drew's financial records "may have been relevant" to Drew having first taken Jackie to dinner on September 28th, and that records in possession of the university "may have been relevant" to the investigation, but that the police department genteelly didn't press the university to divulge them.  

-UVA and other colleges and universities routinely allow rapists either to continue their education without interruption or to take some time off and then return to school.  

-UVA and many other colleges and universities routinely have difficulty with fraternities that don't register their parties.  According to the Charlottesville police statement, even registered parties don't have records. 

-T. Rees Shapiro, the "Education Reporter" at the Washington Post who led the charge against the Rolling Stone article, had no experience that I know of investigating crime.  He graduated from an all-boys', private high school in Virginia and then from Virginia Tech.  His father was a sports reporter at the Washington Post.  The Washington Post had previously been criticized for some misogynist publications, which were forgotten in the midst of the pre-Me-Too-prominence media assault on the Rolling Stone article.   



Speaking of Virginia Tech:




This 13-year-old girl took her Minions blanket to the scene of her murder.  She thought that she was going to meet her boyfriend; that's what he had told her he was.  He and his female friend, another Virginia Tech student, killed her.  That was in 2016, after 6 years of the conglomerate promoting sexual harassment, stalking, rape, the sexual abuse of children and the murder of women.  


-You know how the Charlottesville police investigated Phi Kappa Psi? By sending a written questionnaire to the brothers, which they could answer or not.

I don't want you to think that the violence and lack of accountability of fraternities is limited to how they treat women.  Why don't you read about the hazing injuries and deaths that have continued for decades? 

How do they get away with it?  Money.  Always.  


Please don't "fuck w Jacquees," all right?  YOU CAN SHUT YOUR STUPID, FUCKING MOUTH INSTEAD!  Alternatively, you can confine your moronic attacks to saying more incredibly stupid things about me.  She never asked me to defend her.  

I researched and wrote about the Rolling Stone case for over 2 years.  I read articles about it.  I read statements and court documents.   

There were three lawsuits against Rolling Stone, all based on the incorrect premise that Jackie was lying.  They were only possible because of the prestige of the Washington Post and the corresponding prestige of other journalistic sources who rallied to destroy the reputation of the reporter who wrote the article and of the editors at Rolling Stone.  I thought that it wasn't necessary for Rolling Stone to publish the name of the fraternity or of the university dean who worked with Jackie the most, but that doesn't mean that the story was a lie or badly reported.  The lawsuit by 3 fraternity brothers was the most disgusting of all.  They weren't named in the Rolling Stone article, unless the nicknames that Jackie heard the brothers calling each other on the night that she was raped were their nicknames.  They all said that they didn't know who she was, and she was a first-year student in her first semester, so how would she know their nicknames?  

They identified themselves by their real names, by filing the lawsuit.  You know what that lawsuit was? "We're the ones that she's talking about.  We didn't do it.  Pay us because that nobody bitch with good grades who couldn't afford a school out of state should have kept her mouth shut." 

Jackie's "friend," who enjoyed her efforts to woo him until he had to choose between their friendship and the UVA culture, didn't mention the concert tickets and bus tickets that she bought him for his birthday during any of the interviews that I saw that featured him and her other, former "friends."  If you decide that I'm right about all of this, you don't need to talk about them.  The world is full of cowards.  They're not out of the ordinary.  You can just stop being an asshole.  






Also: why don't you ask Katy Perry about her relationship with Robert Pattinson, which was right after he broke up with Kristen Stewart? Why don't you ask Ms. Stewart why she never bullies Ms. Perry?  Why don't you ask Ms. Perry about all of the other celebrities whom she has flirted or slept with?  Why don't you ask Taylor Swift the same thing, even though Ms. Swift isn't as much of a RAGING WHORE as Ms. Perry? 

Taylor Swift has a different problem, which is that if there's anyone that I'm talking to, she feels that she has to have that person.  Why don't you ask her how her relationship with a Kennedy dissolved? She placed a particularly bad bet that time, although she didn't know it then.  

Consenting adults can do what they want, as far as I'm concerned.  It's when they band together to hypocritically attack someone that there's an issue, especially when their target has his or her human rights violated as the result.